DOCUMENT: Sworn Affidavit Eyewitness Forced 6 Feet Away Behind Someone Blocking Military Ballot Count
- November 17, 2020
- Posted by: Craig Chamberlin
- Category: Social Media
The media who lied to the American people for four years would like them all to believe we can trust them this time. Well, we can’t. That ship has long sailed. The Trump administration filed suit against Michigan on November 11th, 2020. Included in that suit were copies of sworn affidavits MADE PUBLIC from American citizens who swore to witnessing a wide variety of election frauds under perjury or penalty of the law.
My goal is to transcribe and publish these affidavits to the best of my ability. I apologize in advance for any spelling or grammatical errors. I am also including a cover photo, page number, and direct link to the PDF file disclosed by the Trump administration. This will allow you to read the affidavit directly.
F******s C******r, being sworn under penalty of perjury:
1. I am personally familiar with the facts stated in this Affidavit , and if sworn as a witness, am competent to testify to them as well.
2. I am a registered voter in the state of Michigan.
3. On November 4, 2020, I went to the TCF Center as a poll challenger. I was issued credentials when I signed into work.
4. I arrived at 6:00 am and left at approx 8:30 pm
5. While I was in the counting area, I personally observed the following:
A) Provisioned ballots were put into a box labeled “votes to be tabulated.” I filed an incident report and turned it into the supervisor in the Republican poll challenger office. This incident took place at table ICC12, Absentee Voter Counting Board 58 at 12:30 pm.
B) “Problem ballot” boxes containing ballots were left unattended at tables 46, 48, 61, and 62. No election supervisors or poll workers were present.
C) At approximately 3pm, at table 55, a poll worker was seated at inspector station 5. I personally observed this poll worker shuffling and re-arranging the ballots to be tabulated. This went on for at least 5 minutes. I did not understand why this was needed, and I did not see the ballots being put into the box labeled “votes to be tabulated.”
D) I was present when poll challengers were forcibly removed from the counting room. I recall this taking place about an hour after I was informed that President Trump requested that the counting be stopped when he learned that poll challengers were being denied entry. When these elections took place, there was a lot of shouting of approval and applause from the poll workers and election supervisors in the room.
E) At approximately 1pm, I was standing near the entrance to the counting room. About 15 feet in front of me was a group of three men, one of whom had a crutch. The men were about 6 feet tall. The man with the crutch took out his phone, held it up above his head, and began videotaping the area where the tabulating machines were located.
The man took a video of about 10 seconds, then put the phone in his pocket. The group of three men turned to face me. I did not see any type of identification or party affiliation on any of them. I walked swiftly to an election worker and reported what I saw, which was the videotaping in the area where pictures and videos were forbidden. When the three men came close to this election worker and me, the election worker told the men that videos and pictures were not allowed in the counting room. One of the men replied in a harsh tone “we didn’t take any pictures or videos.” The election worker replied “don’t do it again” but did not ask the man to delete the video.
F) I witnessed a poll worker at inspection station 2 locating the record of an absentee voter using the Electronic Poll Book on a laptop computer. I was standing approximately 3 feet behind her to her right. After she scanned the envelope, no record came up. She then started typing the voter’s name into the electronic poll book. The date of birth field was blank. The poll worker typed 01/01/1900 into the date of birth field. This would indicate that the voter would be 120 years old. Certainly possible, but improbable. I challenged this record. The Election Supervisor came to the table and told the poll worker to delete the record. I could not confirm if the record had been deleted. The ballot number was 06366.
G) When the military ballots were starting to be transcribed, it was about 7pm. I was at a table where a military ballot was being tabulated. There was one person speaking the vote choice on the military ballot to another poll worker to her right who was copying the vote choices into a standard ballot. There was a person without any identification and dressed as a regular person without a department of elections shirt / blouse on. One of the table poll workers came to my right and told me to maintain a 6 foot distance. I replied that the 6 foot distance order was relaxed. She insisted that I back away. I asked who this person standing between the reader and copier was. I was told she is a poll worker who needed to monitor the process. The person without poll worker credentials had both elbows out to her side preventing me from observing the ballot copying. The person who told me to keep six foot distance said that if I did not comply I would be evicted. I left the table to find another one so I could remain in the counting room, I felt very intimidated.
H) When the military ballots began to be distributed to the counting tables, Election Supervisors would grab 2,3, maybe 4 at a time, which made it impossible for us to cover all of the ballot transcribing. I believe that this was done on purpose.
I) The counting room supervisor would announce over the PA system that he needed to meet with Election Supervisors and Table Leads many times during the time I was in the counting room. This was very distracting to those of us trying to concentrate on what was going on at the tables we were trying to monitor.SIGNED: F******s C******r
Trump Campaign Michigan Lawsuit – Sworn Affidavit Exhibit 1, Page 48 – 53
This is just one of the many affidavits provided to the public and the media from the Trump Campaign. They are disclosed for PUBLIC RECORD. One should ask themselves why the mainstream media is not disclosing, following up, or investigating these claims.